Code authors Habrahabr
Paraphrase the words of Tim O'reilly: we like..., because here we are free to write and communicate with smart people. But frankness does not mean lack of civility. We bring you this "code of the authors Habrahabr" in the hope that it will help to create a culture that encourages personal attitude and a constructive dialogue.
It is not a document, which must be strictly adhered to. This is not a document. These are the rules that keep some authors in the resource.
I Agree with these rules and act in accordance with them following the authors Habrahabr: ManPavel, NaFigator, norguhtar, vpol, rosnovsky, 2Bad, DileSoft, alammi, Uznick, Miker, mmost, hedin, p1uton, lovermann, Severus, Karlsson, bobuk, rossomachin, @MrProRunner, powerman, Mio, julia, PAD, Synth, masterbo, CurlyBrace, Nicholass, Cosss, oleg_bunin, unno, eXtractor, zemlanin, blockdog, snoopy, drhyperkalich, pozitivevil.
(if you add yourself SDAs)
To support, ignore, add to, or to drown these rules are — as always — you decide. Let's edit these rules together!
Maybe someone here this information is useful to: recently found something that perfectly characterizes the right to publish texts me is the license Creative Commons, "attribution — Noncommercial — share alike".
This
<span xmlns:dc="purl.org/dc/elements/1.1" href="purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text" rel="dc:type" > work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License.
Creative Commons Attribution icon Creative Commons Noncommercial icon Creative Commons No Derivative Works icon
Deserves also suggested O'reilly classification of sites to sites that adhere to the "code of conduct blogger" sites and the "Free zone" (anything goes), in which a person will be open, and no one controlled area — at your own risk. Does it make sense to do the same for hepatopetal?
In any case: it will be even more interesting!
Habrahabr!
In the topic used information from the following sources:
www.habrahabr.ru/blog/blogosphere/8786.html
radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/draft_bloggers_1.html
ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons
Article based on information from habrahabr.ru
It is not a document, which must be strictly adhered to. This is not a document. These are the rules that keep some authors in the resource.
I Agree with these rules and act in accordance with them following the authors Habrahabr: ManPavel, NaFigator, norguhtar, vpol, rosnovsky, 2Bad, DileSoft, alammi, Uznick, Miker, mmost, hedin, p1uton, lovermann, Severus, Karlsson, bobuk, rossomachin, @MrProRunner, powerman, Mio, julia, PAD, Synth, masterbo, CurlyBrace, Nicholass, Cosss, oleg_bunin, unno, eXtractor, zemlanin, blockdog, snoopy, drhyperkalich, pozitivevil.
(if you add yourself SDAs)
To support, ignore, add to, or to drown these rules are — as always — you decide. Let's edit these rules together!
Maybe someone here this information is useful to: recently found something that perfectly characterizes the right to publish texts me is the license Creative Commons, "attribution — Noncommercial — share alike".
This license allows others to revise, correct and develop your work non-commercial basis, until they mention your authorship and license derivative works on the same license terms. Users can not only upload your work and continue to spread it, but to translate, to create other derivative works based on your work. All new works based on yours will have the same license, so any derivative works would also be non-commercial.in order to specify that your material corresponds to this type of license, the text you'd like to embed this block (you can take SDAs):
This
<span xmlns:dc="purl.org/dc/elements/1.1" href="purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text" rel="dc:type" > work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 License.
Creative Commons Attribution icon Creative Commons Noncommercial icon Creative Commons No Derivative Works icon
Deserves also suggested O'reilly classification of sites to sites that adhere to the "code of conduct blogger" sites and the "Free zone" (anything goes), in which a person will be open, and no one controlled area — at your own risk. Does it make sense to do the same for hepatopetal?
In any case: it will be even more interesting!
Habrahabr!
In the topic used information from the following sources:
www.habrahabr.ru/blog/blogosphere/8786.html
radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/draft_bloggers_1.html
ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий