The etiquette of carpolithes
to finally close the topic of karma smarmy and all the rest, offered to come up with something like etiquette of carpolithes.
1. Not minusovat a karma of those who have it <5.
So karma so people can't post, so why the control needs a shot in the head? What wonder resource? To ensure that people had the opportunity to share knowledge, experience, and get them from other people. What cons? For not liked the idea or people do not agree with the author. And these are always. If the article is good, and like, for example, 97 out of 100. Those 3 definitely will not forget to reduce the karma, and from 97 is unlikely that 1 will remember about it. The resulting negative balance for a normal post.
2. Didn't like the article — vote minus the article itself, if you don't want to make it an eyesore on the main page. But why give up on the author. He can write something interesting next time, seeing that his current article has not passed.
3. Respect the opinions of others. I understand that in the real world is not enough, what about the Internet talking. It is because of snobbery"more authoritative" abrollsoftware to newcomers, they'll think 1000 times before to Express their own opinion. In this situation will always be the idyll of opinions, but no clash of thoughts, ideas, nothing new to be born will not be exact.
Here is a small list of three things that would greatly improve the lives and quality of communication between people. I don't know what effect will make this post(maybe the last), and what are the implications(it is unlikely that this attempt will change the direction of movement of the big colossus), but not for a moment regret it.
Article based on information from habrahabr.ru
1. Not minusovat a karma of those who have it <5.
So karma so people can't post, so why the control needs a shot in the head? What wonder resource? To ensure that people had the opportunity to share knowledge, experience, and get them from other people. What cons? For not liked the idea or people do not agree with the author. And these are always. If the article is good, and like, for example, 97 out of 100. Those 3 definitely will not forget to reduce the karma, and from 97 is unlikely that 1 will remember about it. The resulting negative balance for a normal post.
2. Didn't like the article — vote minus the article itself, if you don't want to make it an eyesore on the main page. But why give up on the author. He can write something interesting next time, seeing that his current article has not passed.
3. Respect the opinions of others. I understand that in the real world is not enough, what about the Internet talking. It is because of snobbery"more authoritative" abrollsoftware to newcomers, they'll think 1000 times before to Express their own opinion. In this situation will always be the idyll of opinions, but no clash of thoughts, ideas, nothing new to be born will not be exact.
Here is a small list of three things that would greatly improve the lives and quality of communication between people. I don't know what effect will make this post(maybe the last), and what are the implications(it is unlikely that this attempt will change the direction of movement of the big colossus), but not for a moment regret it.
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий